Socio-Economic Analysis of Soyabeanutilization in Akure South Local Government Area, Ondo State


Utilization, Socio-economics, Gross margin and regression.

How to Cite

J.A. Folayan, & J.O. Bifarin. (2013). Socio-Economic Analysis of Soyabeanutilization in Akure South Local Government Area, Ondo State. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 9, 236–242.


This study was carried out for the purpose of analyzing the socio-economic of soyabean inAkure South Local Government Area of Ondo state with the objective of examining the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents Data were collected from one hundred (100) respondents drawn from five communities using well structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed using frequency distribution, percentages and regression model while gross margin was used to determined the profitability of the utilization operators. The outcome of the study revealed that 76% of the respondents involved in utilization were females, about 82% of the respondents were married and 87% were educated. All 100% of the respondent reported that utilization increase their annual incomes. The gross margin result revealed that N11, 877 accrued to a respondent per month in the study area. The outcome of regression analysis revealed that the level of education, occupation, family size, experience and annual income had positive correlation with quantity of utilization whereas, the negative correlation in the storage, inadequate finance, lack of producing farmers, inadequate enlightenment campaign programme by extension workers were emphasized as the problems confronting the utilization in the area. It is recommended that the government should put in place adequate and efficient credit facility to enhance operational activities, provide regular and continuous enlightenment campaign programme by extension workers to the respondents and assist in the regular provision of adequate storage facilities and power supply for preservation of the products.


Mpepereki S, Makonese F, Giller KE. A small holders cropping system of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe 1996; p. 87.

Lassitar AI. Factor affecting the nutritional quantity of and product. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1981; p. 87.

Nylakura O. Soyabean production in Nigeria – Prospects and Problems Proceeding and Second National Meeting of Nigeria Scientists, Zaria, Nigeria. IAR Publication 1982; pp. 2: 26-39.

Knipscheer HC, Peter AY. The potential in Nigeria. The Result of International Intitutte of Tropical Agriculture, IITA Ibadan 1982; pp. 56-59.

Oyekan PO. Report of the National coordinated Research Project on s proceeding of the Fifth National Meeting of Nigeria Scientists Publication 1985; 5: 7-9.

Osho SM, Ogundipe HO. The Technology Adoption Process in Subsistence Agriculture 1995; pp. 79-103.

Adjebeng–Asem S, Osho: The Status of production, processing and Utilization in Nigeria 1992; p. 303.

FAO-FAOSTATS 2005 Food and Agriculture Organization.

Peter Gold Smith. Economics of production, Marketing and Utilization 2004; p. 121.

Goldsmith PG, Ranmos G, Steiger C. Intellectuals property piracy in a Morth contect: evidence. Agric Econ 2006; p. 35.

FAO – FAOSTATS 2007: Food and Agricultural organization. Http://

Goldsmith PD, Schnitkey G. most Scenario model.crop year 2005 decision – making requires planning feedstuffs 2005; 77.

Adams SO. utilization in Akure South Local Government Area of Ondo State: An unpublished thesis submitted to the Department of Agriculture Extension and Management; Federal College of Agriculture, Akure Ondo State, Nigeria 2010.

USDA – NASS 2007a: appusage.cfm

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2013 J.A. Folayan , J.O. Bifarin