Neglect is a Spatial Failure of Alerting Mechanisms Required for Awareness: An ERP Study


 Neglect, alerting, awareness, event-related potential, recovery, space.

How to Cite

Heikki Hämäläinen, Myoung Soo Kwon, Arja Lindell, Maarit Jalas, Jutta Torsti, & Olli Tenovuo. (2014). Neglect is a Spatial Failure of Alerting Mechanisms Required for Awareness: An ERP Study. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 10, 239–256.


In the present study, we describe a group of right brain-damaged (RBD) patients with neglect or extinction, most of them affected in all three (visual, auditory, somatosensory) modalities studied. We applied event-related potential (ERP) analysis to reveal the neural mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. ERPs to stimuli of all three modalities were determined for the patients with neglect/extinction at (sub)acute phase, and 3 and 12 months post-stroke. Our results demonstrated that N1 deflections in ERPs, reflecting fronto-parietal alerting mechanisms, wereabsent or diminished/delayed in neglect, and the waves became normalized with recovery from neglect. In somatosensory ERPs, similar changes were evident also in P1 deflections preceding the N1, reflecting activation of the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII).
We also demonstrated somatosensory ERPs of some of our patients who showed different responses elicited by low intensity electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist depending on the location of the hands either in uncrossed anatomical position or crossed over the body midline to the other hemispace. Our results indicate that there are cases among patients with hemispatial neglect who do indeed show emergence or increment of responses to left-hand stimulation when the arm is crossed to the right hemispace.
Therefore, we propose that the mechanism underlying hemispatial neglect is the disruption of the flow of (location related) sensory information to awareness at the level of multimodal alerting mechanisms.


Näätänen R. Attention and brain function, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1992.

Railo H, Koivisto M, Revonsuo A. Tracking the processes behind conscious perception: a review of event-related potential correlates of visual consciousness. Conscious Cogn 2011; 20: 972-983.

Lhermitte F, Turell E, LeBrigand D, Chain F. Unilateral visual neglect and wave P300. A study of nine cases with unilateral lesions of the parietal lobes. Arch Neurol 1985; 42: 567-573.

Vallar G, Sandroni P, Rusconi ML, Barbieri S. Hemianopia, hemianesthesia, and hemispatial neglect: a study with evoked potentials. Neurology 1991; 41: 1918-1922.

Spinelli D, Burr DC, Morrone MC. Spatial neglect is associated with increased latencies of visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 1994; 11: 909-918.

Viggiano MP, Spinelli D, Mecacci L. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with hemineglect syndrome. Brain Cogn 1995; 27: 17-35.

Verleger R, Heide W, Butt C, Wascher E, Kömpf D. On-line brain potential correlates of right parietal patients’ attentional deficit. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 99: 444-457.

Deouell LY, Bentin S, Soroker N. Electrophysiological evidence for an early (pre-attentive) information processing deficit in patients with right hemisphere damage and unilateral neglect. Brain 2000; 123: 353-365.

Di Russo F, Aprile T, Spitoni G, Spinelli D. Impaired visual processing of contralateral stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study. Brain 2008; 131: 842-854.

Marzi CA, Girelli M, Miniussi C, Smania N, Maravita A. Electrophysiological correlates of conscious vision: evidence from unilateral extinction. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12: 869-877.

Eimer M, Maravita A, Van Velzen J, Husain M, Driver J. The electrophysiology of tactile extinction: ERP correlates of unconscious somatosensory processing. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 2438-2447.

Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Winter KH, Triggs WJ, Heilman KM. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 2007; 69: 1122-1127.

Driver J, Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 2001; 79: 39-88.

Tarkka IM, Luukkainen-Markkula R, Pitkänen K, Hämäläinen H. Alterations in visual and auditory processing in hemispatial neglect: an evoked potential follow-up study. Int J Psychophysiol 2011; 79: 272-279.

Koivisto M, Revonsuo A, Lehtonen M. Independence of visual awareness from the scope of attention: an electrophysiological study. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 415-424.

Schubert R, Blankenburg F, Lemm S, Villringer A, Curio G. Now you feel it, now you don’t: ERP correlates of somatosensory awareness. Psychophysiology 2006; 43: 31-40.

Hämäläinen H, Kekoni J, Sams M, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 75: 13 21.

Hämäläinen H, Hiltunen J, Titievskaja I. fMRI activations of SI and SII cortices depend on attention. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 1673-1676.

Kekoni J, Tiihonen J, Hämäläinen H. Fast decrement with stimulus repetition in ERPs generated by neuronal networks involving somatosensory SI and SII cortices: electric and magnetic response recordings in humans. Int J Psychophysiol 1992; 12: 281-288.

Kekoni J, Hämäläinen H, Saarinen M, Gröhn J, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans. Biol Psychol 1997; 46: 125-142.

Forss N, Hari R, Salmelin R, Ahonen A, Hämäläinen M, Kajola M, Knuutila J, Simola J. Activation of the human posterior parietal cortex by median nerve stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1994; 99: 309-315.

Gallace A, Spence C. Touch and the body: the role of the somatosensory cortex in tactile awareness. Psyche 2010; 16: 30-67.

Smania N, Aglioti S. Sensory and spatial components of somaesthetic deficits following right brain damage. Neurology 1995; 45: 1725-1730.

Aglioti S, Smania N, Peru A. Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients. J Cogn Neurosci 1999; 11: 67-79.

Spinelli D, Di Russo F. Visual evoked potentials are affected by trunk rotation in neglect patients. Neuroreport 1996; 31: 553-556.

Eimer M, Cockburn D, Smedley B, Driver J. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Exp Brain Res 2001; 139: 398-411.

Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JM, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg W, Rorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870.

Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioral inattention test, Titchfield, UK: Thames Valley Test Company 1987.

Lindell AB, Jalas MJ, Tenovuo O, Brunila T, Voeten MJ, Hämäläinen H. Clinical assessment of hemispatial neglect: evaluation of different measures and dimensions. Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 21: 479-493.

Crawford JR, Howell DC. Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 12: 482-486.

Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Single-case research in neuropsychology: a comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls. Cortex 2012; 48: 1009-1016.

Pavani F, Làdavas E, Driver J. Auditory and multisensory aspects of visuospatial neglect. Trends Cogn Sci 2003; 7: 407-414.

Di Russo F, Bozzacchi C, Matano A, Spinelli D. Hemispheric differences in VEPs to lateralised stimuli are a marker of recovery from neglect. Cortex 2013; 49: 931-939.

Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24: 375-425.

Hämäläinen H, Pirilä J, Lahtinen E, Lindroos J, Salmelin R. Cognitive ERP components in neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 1999; 11 Suppl Abstracts Ann Meeting Soc Cogn Neurosci 58.

Robertson IH, Mattingley JB, Rorden C, Driver J. Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness. Nature 1998; 395: 169-172.

Deouell LY, Hämäläinen H, Bentin S. Unilateral neglect following right hemisphere damage: contributions from event- related potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 225-234.

Corbetta M, Schulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 201-215.

Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn Neurosci 1998; 2: 87-97.

Hämäläinen H, Hiltunen J, Titievskaja I. Activation of somatosensory cortical areas varies with attentional state: an fMRI study. Behav Brain Res 2002; 135: 159-165.

Bisiach E, Capitani E, Porta E. Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: evidence from unilateral neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48: 141-144.

Làdavas E. Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? Brain 1987; 110: 167-180.

Weiskrantz L, Zhang D. Residual tactile sensitivity with self-directed stimulation in hemianaesthesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 632-634.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2014 Heikki Hämäläinen, Myoung Soo Kwon, Arja Lindell, Maarit Jalas, Jutta Torsti, Olli Tenovuo