Continuous Ethanol Fermentation in Immersed, Cross-Flow Microfiltration Membrane Bioreactor with Cell Retention


 Continuous ethanol fermentation, hollow fiber, cross-flow microfiltration, membrane bioreactor, cell retention, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

How to Cite

Olga Radočaj, & Levente L. Diosady. (2014). Continuous Ethanol Fermentation in Immersed, Cross-Flow Microfiltration Membrane Bioreactor with Cell Retention. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 10, 543–553.


The key objective of this study was to devise a continuous ZeeWeed® membrane-based, immersed, microfiltration (MF) laboratory scale fermentation system for ethanol production with cell retention to achieve effective ethanol productivity, flux rates and sugar utilization. The new bioreactor was compared to the fermentation kinetics’ of the ultrafiltration unit.A synthetic glucose based medium was fermented by fresh, baker’s yeast to produce ethanol. The cells were not recycled; the medium was continuously withdrawn by filtration through an internal, immersed hollow-fiber cartridge. In this way, the inside of the membrane was exposed to the ethanolic solution, while broth with viable yeast cells remained outside the membrane. This design, with a cell retention system, provided much less membrane fouling (loss of about 76% of the original water flux after 96 hours of filtration) than while using the ultrafiltration (UF) external hollow-fiber membrane with cell recycling (loss of 97% of the original water flux after 2-3 hours of operation). Both modules converted at least 95% of glucose with biomass concentration of 30 g/L, and the final ethanol concentration of 62 g/L. However, the UF membrane became plugged after only 2 hrs of operation. The ZeeWeed® membrane operated successfully for 96 hrs with a final flux of 4 L/h m2 with ethanol concentration of 62.4 g/l, biomass yield 0.34 g/g and cell viability of 95.3%. This concept could be successfully used for biofuel production. A very strong positive correlation was observed between the biomass and EtOH concentration (R=0.98; at p<0.05).


Mishra MS, Chandrashekhar B, Chatterjee T, Singh K. Production of bio-ethanol from jatropha oilseed cakes via dilute acid hydrolysis and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Biotech Appl 2011; 3: 41-47.

Goueva BMV, Torres C, Franca AS, Oliveira LS, Oliveira ES. Feasibility of ethanol production from coffee husks. Biotechnol Lett 2009; 31: 1315-1319.

Banat FA, Al-Rub FA, Shannag M. Modeling of dilute ethanol-water mixture separation by membrane distillation. Sep Purif Technol 1999; 16: 119-131.

Rayess YE, Albasi C, Bacchin P, Taillandier P, Raynal J, Mietton-Peuchot M, Devatine A. Cross-flow microfiltration applied to oenology: A review. J Membrane Sci 2011; 382: 1-19.

Vishwanathan KH, Govindaraju K, Singh V, Subramanian R. Production of okara and soy protein concentrates using membrane technology. J Food ScI 2011; 75: E158-E164.

Mukhopadhyay S, Tomasula PM, Van Hekken D, Luchansky JB, Call JE, Porto-Fett A. Effectiveness of cross-flow microfiltration for removal of microorganisms associated with unpasteurized liquid egg white from process plant. J Food Sci 2009; 74: M319-M327.

Machado RMD, Haneda RN, Trevisan BP, Fonte SR. Effect of enzymatic treatment on the cross-flow microfiltration of acai pulp: Analysis of the fouling and recovery of phytochemicals. J Food Eng 2012; 113: 442-452.

Chen C, Tang X, Xiao Z, Zhou Y, Jiang Y, Fu S. Ethanol fermentation kinetics in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation system with pervaporation membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 2012; 114: 707-710.

Verbelen PJ, de Shutter DP, Delavux F, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR, Immobilized yeast cell systems for continuous fermentation applications. Biotechnol Lett 2006; 28: 1515-1525.

Mehaia MA, Cheryan M. Ethanol production in a hollow fiber bioreactor using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotech 1984; 20: 100-104.

Cheryan M, Mehaia M. Ethanol production in a membrane recycle bioreactor: Conversion of glucose using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 1984; 19: 205-208.

Castaing JB, Masse A, Sechet V, Sabiri N-E, Pontie M, Haure J, Jaouen P. Immersed hollow fibers microfiltration (MF) for removing undesirable micro-algae and protecting semi-closed aquaculture basins. Desalination 2011; 276: 386-396.

Merz C, Scheumann R, Hamouri BE, Kraume M. Membrane bioreactor technology for the treatment of greywater from a sports and leisure club. Desalination 2007; 215: 37-43.

McDonald VR. Direct microscopic technique to detect viable yeast cells in pasteurized orange drink. J Food Sci 1963; 28: 135-139.

Gupta S, ChandS. Bioconversion of Sugars to ethanol in a chemostat employing S. cerevisiae - dynamic response to perturbations in process parameters. Process Biochem 1994; 29: 343-354.

Ghose TK, Tyagy RD. Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate I. Batch versus continuous systems. Biotech Bioeng 1979; 21: 1387-1400.

AOAC - Official Methods of Analysis, (984.14), Washington, DC, USA 1990.

Margaritis A, Wilke CR. The rotofermentor. II. Application to ethanol fermentation. Biotech Bioeng 1978; 20: 727-753.

Stanbury PF, Whitaker A, Hall SJ. Principles of Fermentation Technology. 2nd ED.Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1995.

Romicon Inc. Ultrafiltration handbook. MA, USA; 1983.

Macauley-Patrick S, Finn B. Modes of Fermenter Operation. In: McNeil B, Harvey LM, editors. Practical Fermentation Technology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England 2008.

Maiorella BL, Blanch HW, Wilke CR. Feed component inhibition in ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotech Bioeng 1984; 26: 1155-1166.

Nishizawa Y, Mitani Y, Tamai M, Nagai S. Ethanol production by cell recycling with hollow fibers. J Ferm Tech 1983; 61: 599-605.

Nishizawa Y, Mitani Y, Fukunishi K, Nagai S. Ethanol production by repeated batch culture with hollow fibers. J Ferm Tech 1984; 62: 41-47.

Hoffmann H, Scheper T, Schügerl K, Schmidt W. Use of membranes to improve bioreactor performance. Chem Eng J 1987; 34: B13-B19.

Tanaka T, Kamimura R, Fujiwara R, Nakanishi K. Cross-flow filtration of yeast broth cultivated in molasses. Biotech Bioeng 1994; 43: 1094-1101.

Daugulis AJ, Axford DB, Ciszek B, Malinowski JJ. Continuous fermentation of high-strength glucose feeds to ethanol. Biotech Lett 1994; 16:637-642.

Borzani W, Jurkiewicz CH. Variation of the ethanol yield during very rapid batch fermentation of sugar-cane blackstrap molasses. Brazilian J Chem Eng 1998; 15: 225-233.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2014 Olga Radočaj, Levente L. Diosady