Lingual Distribution of Tuberculosis Patients in Karachi - A Demographic Analysis


 Lingual, tuberculosis, demographic, Karachi, socioeconomic.

How to Cite

Muhammad Miandad, Farkhunda Burke, Syed Nawaz-ul-Huda, Salahuddin Ghazi, & Muhammad Azam. (2015). Lingual Distribution of Tuberculosis Patients in Karachi - A Demographic Analysis. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 11, 74–80.


The main objective of this paper is to investigate tuberculosis patients’ demographic distribution including their sociocultural impacts among various ethnic groups in the study area. Data was collected through questionnaire survey (interviewing patients) at TB diagnostic centers in the study area over a period of eight months (March to October 2013). Analysis was made with the help of Microsoft excel and SPSS version 20 for demographic analysis.The questionnaire survey revealed the respondents in terms of languages as Urdu (33.28), Sindhi (20.63), Punjabi (14.98), Pashtu (11.48), Seraiki (10.48%) and other languages 14.81. Researchers have identified other languages (which included, Hindko, Balti, Persian, Brahvi, Marwari, Gilgiti, Gujrati) as being the most vulnerable/impoverished lingual groups in the study area. Demographically, Urdu speaking TB patients were recorded as 53% females, but the case of Sindhi speaking female patients was slightly high (50.81%) compared to males. Punjabi speaking patients were found to number almost similar to the Urdu speaking patients as the percentage of females was 52.22%. Pashtu speaking females amounted to 44.9 %, while males recorded highest percentage i.e. 55.07%.
The occurrence of TB in the purview of lingual distribution of population in Karachi provides an insight into the transmission of the disease especially in the context of the global as well as local environment, cultural and politico-economic scenario.


WHO, World Health Organization, Annual Report, 2013, (Retrieved on May 10, 2014 from

Ho M. Sociocultural aspects of tuberculosis: a literature review and a case study of immigrant tuberculosis. Social Science Medicine 2004; 59: 753-762.

Metzger P, Baloch NA, Kazi GN, Bile KM. Tuberculosis control in Pakistan: reviewing a decade of success and challenges. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2010; 16: 47-53.

Hasan R, Jabeen K, Ali A, Rafiq Y, Laiq R, Malik B, Tanveer M, Groenheit R, Ghebremichael S, Hoffner S, Hasan Z. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, Pakistan. Emerg Infect Dis 2010; 16(9): 1473-5.

Ayaz A, Hasan Z, Jafri S, Inayat R, Mangi R, Channa, AA, Malik FR, Ali A, Rafiq R, Hasan R. Characterizing Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Karachi, Pakistan: drug resistance and genotypes. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012; 16: 303-309.

Shah SK, Dogar OF, Siddiqi K. Tuberculosis in women from Pashtun region: an ecological study in Pakistan. Epidemiol Infect 2014; 3: 1-9.

Dogar O, et al. Gender disparity in tuberculosis cases in eastern and western provinces of Pakistan. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012; 12: 244.

WHO. Global tuberculosis report. Geneva: World Health Organization 2012.

Alavi-Naini R, Sharifi-Mood B, Metanat M. The gender differences in tuberculosis in a highly endemic region of Iran. Journal of Medical Sciences 2007; 7: 1218-1220.

Diwan VK, Thorson A. Sex, gender, and tuberculosis. Lancet 1999; 353: 1000-1001.

Wieland ML, Weis JA, Yawn BP, Sullivan SM, Millington KL, Smith CM, Bertram S, Nigon JA, Sia IG. Perceptions of Tuberculosis among Immigrants and Refugees at an Adult Education Center: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach. J Immigr Minor Health 2012; 14(1): 14-22.

Ito K. Health culture and the clinical encounter: Vietnamese refugees’ responses to preventive drug treatment of inactive tuberculosis. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1999; 13(3): 338-364.

Steen T, Mazonde G. Ngakayasetswana, ngakayasekgoa or both? Health seeking behaviour in Batswana with pulmonary tuberculosis. Social Science & Medicine 1999; 48(2): 163-172.

Khan A, Walley J, Newell J, Imdad N. Tuberculosis in Pakistan: socio-cultural constraints and opportunities in treatment. Social Science & Medicine 2000; 50(2): 247-254.

Liefooghe R, Michiels N, Habib S, Moran M, De Muynck A. Perception and social consequences of tuberculosis: A focus group study of tuberculosis patients in Sialkot, Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 41(2): 1685-1692.

Ganapathy S, Thomas BE, Jawahar K, Selvi JA, Sivasubramaniam Weiss M. Perceptions of gender and tuberculosis in a south Indian urban Community. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis 2008; 55(1): 9-14

Westaway M. Knowledge and attitudes about tuberculosis of black hospitalized TB patients. Tubercle 1990; 71: 55-59.

Long NH, et al. Longer delays in tuberculosis diagnosis among women in Vietnam. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 1999; 3: 388-393.

Karim F, et al. Gender differences in delays in diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Health Policy and Planning 2007; 22: 329-334.

Karim F, et al. Female-male differences at various clinical steps of tuberculosis management in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2008; 12: 1336-1339.

NTPP, National tuberculosis control programme, Pakistan, Annual Report. Ministry of Health and Coordination 2012; Government of Pakistan.

Miandad M, Burke F, Huda SN, Azam M. Tuberculosis incidence in Karachi: A spatio-temporal analysis.Malasian journal of society and space. GEOGRAFIA. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 2014; 10(5): 1-8.

Lohano HR. Poverty dynamics in rural Sindh, Pakistan. Chronic Poverty Research Center, 2009. Retrieved on September 13, 2014 from uploads/publication_files/WP157%20Lohano.pdf

PCO. Pakistan Census Organization, Government of Pakistan, 2000; Retrieved on September 10, 2014 from

Huda SN, Burke F, Anwar E, Ahmed I, Miandad M, Azam M. Spatial analysis of sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentration in Karachi, Megapolis, Pakistan. Lasbela University Journal of Science and Technology 2013; 2(1): 1-18.

Oxlade O, Murray M. Tuberculosis and Poverty: Why Are the Poor at Greater Risk in India? Plose One 2012; 7(11): 1-8.

Harling G, Castro MC. A spatial analysis of social and economic determinants of tuberculosis in Brazil. Health & Place, 2014; 25: 56-67.

Hossain S, Quaiyum MA, Zaman K, Banu S, Husain MA, Islam MA, Cooreman E, Borgdorff M, Lonnroth KM, Salim AH, Leth F. Socio Economic Position in TB Prevalence and Access to Services: Results from a Population Prevalence Survey and a Facility-Based Survey in Bangladesh. Plos One 2012; 7(9): 1-8.

Mangtani P, Jolley DJ, Watson JM, Rodrigues LC. Socioeconomic deprivation and notification rates for tuberculosis in London during 1982-91. BMJ 1995; 310: 963-966.

Rostami-Povey E. Afghan Women: Identity and Invasion. London: Zed Books 2007.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 Muhammad Miandad, Farkhunda Burke, Syed Nawaz-ul-Huda, Salahuddin Ghazi , Muhammad Azam