Effects of Bio-Pesticides on Biology of Chrysoperla carnea F. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)


 Chrysoperla carnea F., Bio-pesticides, Biology, Synthetic pesticides.

How to Cite

S. Shahzad Ali,  M.Y. Khaskheli, S. Sohail Ahmed, Huma Rizwana, Aslam Bukero,  Gulzar Thebo, Shahzad Ali Nahyo, Irshad Ali Rattar, & Sarfraz Ahmad. (2015). Effects of Bio-Pesticides on Biology of Chrysoperla carnea F. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 11, 559–566. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.74


The experiment was conducted on effects of bio-pesticides on biology of Chrysoperla carnea F. under laboratory conditions. The neem and datura leaf extracts were used as bio-pesticides and their effect was compared with confidor at 26±2°C, 65±5% R. H and photoperiod (16L: 8D) in the | department of Entomology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan during 2014. The results shows that the incubation periods of eggs of C. carnea feeding on Aphis gossypii treated with neem, datura and confidor was 2.2, 2.5 and 3.6 days respectively. The result indicated that the total larval developmental period was 17.03, 13.3 and 15.09, respectively. The pupal period of C. carnea was 8.82 on neem, 10.9 on datura and 12.33 days on confidor. The result further revealed that the pre oviposition period of C. carnea was 6.35 on neem, 5.5 on datura and 3.6 on confidor. The oviposition period was 34.42 on neem, 30.6 on datura and 26.4 on confidor. The post oviposition period was significantly different was 8.5 days on neem 6.9 on datura and 4.7 on confidor. The maximum fecundity per female of C. carnea was 448.38 days on neem, 435.67 on datura and 413.67 on confidor. Similarly, maximum egg hatching percentage of C.carnea was recorded on neem followed by datura and confidor. However, the maximum egg mortality (37.65%) was recorded on confidor. However, minimum mortality of 1st, 2nd and 3rd instar larvae was recorded due to neem leaf extracts followed by datura and confidor. The pupal mortality was seen more on neem followed by datura and confidor. The highest adult mortality was obtained on neem followed by datura and confidor insecticide.



Tjeder B. Neuroptera from Newfoundland, Miqulon, and Labrador. Opuscula Entomol 1960; 25: 146-149.

Mendel Z, Dunkelblum E, Branco M, Franco JC, Kurosawa S, Mori K. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of diene modified analogs of Matsucoccussex pheromones. Naturwissenschaften 2003; 90: 313-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0429-0

Zhang QH, Sheng ML, Chen GF, Aldrich JR, Chauhan KR. Iridodial: A powerful attractant for the green lacewing, Chrysopa septem punctata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Naturwissenschaften 2006; 93: 461-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0132-z

Kaitazov A, Kharizanov A. The possibilities for using Chrysopidae. Rastitelna Zashchita 1976; 24: 22-25.

Tauber CA, Tauber MJ. A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversiÞcation and seasonal isolation. Nature (Lond.) 1997; 268: 702-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/268702a0

Zhu JW, Obrycki JJ, Ochieng SA, Baker TC, Pickett JA, Smiley D. Attraction of two lacewing species to volatiles produced by host plants and aphid prey. Naturwissenschaften 2005; 92: 277-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0624-2

Sengonca C, Grooterhorst A. The feeding activity of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) on Barathrabrassicae L. and Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Entomologie 1985; 100: 219-223.

Grenier S, Greany PD, Cohen AC. Potential for mass release of insect parasitoids and predators through development of artificial culture techniques. In: Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control- A Florida Perspective (D. Ronen, F. D. Bennett, and J. L. Capinera, Eds): 181-206. Intercept. Andover, Hants, UK 1994.

Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Lopez-Arroyo JI. Life-history variation in Chrysoperla carnea: Implications for rearing and storage a Mexicon population. Biological Control 2000; 8: 185-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1996.0500

Michaud JP. Evaluation of green lacewings, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Fitch) (Neuroptera) augmentative release against Toxopteracitricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) in citrus. J Appl Entomol 2001; 122: 383-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2001.00560.x

Legaspi JC, Carruthers RI, Nordlund DA. Life history of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) provided sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and other food. Southwestern Entomologist 1994; 4: 178-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1994.1028

Hunter CD. Suppliers of Beneficial Organisms in North America. California EPA, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation, l020 N. Street, Room l6l, Sacramento, CA 95814-5604; 916/324-4100, 1994.

Penny ND, Tauber CA, De Leon T. A new species of Chrysopa from western North America with a key to North American species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of Entomological Society of America 2000; 93: 776-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0776:ANSOCF

James DG. Field evaluation of herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects: methyl salicylate and the green lacewing, Chrysoperla nigricornis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2006; 29: 1601-1609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024270713493

Michaud JP. Evaluation of green lacewings, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Fitch) (Neuroptera) augmentative release against Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) in citrus. Journal of Applied Entomology 2001; 122: 383-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2001.00560.x

Patel KG, Vyas HN. Biology of green lacewing Chrysopascelestes (Banks) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) an important predator in Gujrat. Gujrat Agri Uni Res J 1985; 11: 18-23.

Rosenheim JA, Lumburg DD, Colfer RG. Impact of generalist predators on a biological control agent, Chrysoperla carnea: Direct observations. Ecological Applications 1999; 9: 409-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0409:IOGPOA

Carrillo M, Elanov P. The potential of Chrysoperla carnea as a biological control agent of Myzuspersicae in glass houses. Annl Appl Biol 2004; 32: 433-439.

Henry CS, Wells MM, Pupedis RJ. Hidden taxonomic diversity within Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): two new species based on courtship songs. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1993; 86: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/86.1.1

Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Thierry D, Duelli P, Johnson JB. The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carneas. lat.) and the sibling species problem 2001; 29-42.

Tsukaguchi S. A check list of published species of Japanese Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Kontyu 1985; 53: 503-506.

Brooks L, Hein G, Johnson G, Legg D, Massey B, Morrison P, Weiss M, Peairs F. Economic impact of the Russian wheat aphid in the western United States: Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 1994; 147: 250-268.

Henry CS, Wells MLM. Adaptation or random change, The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Anim Behav 2004; 68: 879-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.032

Taki H, Kuroki S, Nomura M. Taxonomic diversity within the Japanese green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), identiÞed by courtship song analyses and crossing tests. J Ethol 2005; 23: 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10164-004-0130-6

Follett PA, Duan JJ. Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. Henry, C. S. 1979. Acoustical communication during courtship and mating in the green lacewing Chrysopela acarnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 2000; 72: 68-79.

Wajnberg E, Scott JK, Quimby PC. Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. Walker TJ. 1964. Cryptic species among sound-producing Ensiferan Orthoptera (Gryllidae and Tettigoniidae). Q Rev Biol 2001; 39: 345-355.

Louda SM, Pemberton RW, Johnson MT, Follett PA. Non target effects on the Achillesheel of biological control. Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu Rev Entomol 2003; 48: 365-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.060402.102800

Mochizuki A, Mitsunaga T. Non-target impact assessment of the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on the indigenous sibling species, C nipponensis (Okamoto) through interspecific predation. Appl Entomol Zool 2004; 39: 217-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1303/aez.2004.217

Henry MA, CS, Brooks SJ, Duelli P, Johnson JB. Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Ann Entomol Soc Am 2002; 95: 172-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0172:DTTCCI

Galven TI, Koch RI, Hutchison WD. Toxicity of commonly used insecticides in sweet corn and soybean to multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae). J Econ Entomol 2005; 98(3): 780-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.780

Hassan SA, Klinghauf F, Shanin F. Role of Chrysoperla carnea as an aphid predator on sugar beet and the effect of pesticides. J Agric Res 2012; 50(4): 515.

Ferrira AJ, Carvalho GA, Botton M, Lasmar O. Selectivity of insecticides used in apple orchards to two populations of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Pest Sci 1989; 14: 259-268.

Balasubramani V, Swamiappan M. Persistent toxicity of some insecticides to the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Ecotox Environ Monitor 1997; 7(3): 197-200.

Medina P, Smagghe G, Budia F, Tirry L, Vinuela E. Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenuron, pyriproxyfen and tebufenozide after topical application in predatory larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology 2007; 32: 194-203.

Bueno AF, Freitas S. Effect of the insecticides abamectin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla externaunder laboratory conditions. BioControl 2004; 49: 277-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000025375.07428.0b

William T, Valle J, Vinula. Is the naturally derived insecticide spinosad compatible with insect natural enemies. Biocont Sci Technol 2003; 13(5): 459-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958315031000140956

Medina P, Budia F, Del-Estal P, Vinuela E. Effect of three modern insecticides, pyriproxyfen, spinosad and tebufenzoid, on survival and reproduction of Chrysoperla carnea adults. Annals of Applied Biology 2003; 142: 55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2003.tb00229.x

Godoy MS, Carvalho GA, Moraes JC, Junior MG, Morais AA, Cosme LV. Selectivity of insecticides used in citrus crops to eggs and larvaeof Chrysoperla carnea (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Neotropical Entomology 2004; 33(5): 639-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000500015

New TR. The biology of Chrysopidae and Hemerodiidae (Neuroptera) with reference to their use as biological agent: A Review. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 1975; 127: 115-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1975.tb00561.x

Nasreen A, Mustafa G, Ashfaq M. Mortality of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) after exposure to some insecticides; laboratory studies. South Pacific Studies 2005; 26(1): 1-6.

Venzon M, Carvalho CF. Desen volvimento larval, pré-pupal e pupal de Ceraeochrysa cubana(Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) emdiferentesdietas e temperaturas. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 1993; 22: 477-483.

Barbosa LR, Sérgio DF, Alexander MA. Biological aspects of the immature stages of Ceraeo chrysaeveres (Banks) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Scientia Agricola 2002; 59(3): 581-583.

Moraes JC. Aspectosbiológicos e seletividade de algunsacaricidasà Ceraeochrysa cubana (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) emlaboratório. Lavras, 1989. 85p. Tese (Mestrado). Escola Superior de Agricultura de Lavras.

Silva RLX, Carvalho CF, Venzon M. Aspectosbiológicos das fasesimaturas de Ceraeo chrysacubana (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera,Chrysopidae), em quarto gerações sucessivas em laboratório. Ciênciae Prática 1994; 18: 13-17.

Santa-Cecilia LVC, Souza B, Carvalho CF. Influência de diferentes dieta sem fases imaturas de Ceraeo chrysacubana (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomológicado Brasil 1997; 26: 309-314.

Nunez ZE. Ciclobiológico y crianza de Chrysoperlaexternay Ceraeo chrysacincta (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Revista Peruana de Entomologia 1988; 31: 76-82.

Giolo FP, Medina P, Grutzmacher AD, Vinuela E. Effects of pesticides commonly used in peach orchards in Brazil on predatory lacewing Chrysoperla carnea under laboratory conditions. BioControl 2009; 54: 625-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10526-008-9197-2

Badawy HMA, El-Arnaouty SA. Direct and indirect effects of some insecticides on Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Neuropterology 1999; 2: 67-74.

Nasreen A, Mustafa G, Ashfaq M. Selectivity of some insecticides to Chrysoperla carnea (Stephen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in laboratory. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2003; 6: 536-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.536.538

Nasreen A, Ghulam M, Ashfaq M. Mortality of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) after exposure to some insecticides; laboratory studies. South Pacific Studies 2005; 26: 1-6.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 S. Shahzad Ali,  M.Y. Khaskheli, S. Sohail Ahmed, Huma Rizwana, Aslam Bukero,  Gulzar Thebo, Shahzad Ali Nahyo, Irshad Ali Rattar , Sarfraz Ahmad