Radiation Dose Distribution Measurements of Kilo-Voltage Photons Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Detectors (OSLs) in Radiological Procedures


 Radiation dose distribution, OSL, depth doses, entrance surface dose.

How to Cite

Syed Mansoor Naqvi, Zaheer Uddin, Zafar Sajjad, Imran Ahmed Siddiqui, & Amjad Hussan. (2016). Radiation Dose Distribution Measurements of Kilo-Voltage Photons Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Detectors (OSLs) in Radiological Procedures. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 12, 258–268. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.40


OSL detectors were used for dose measurement in a solid water phantom. Two other detectors, Cobia Flex (RTI Electronics) and PTW-Diados were also used to verify the measurements. Radiation doses were measured for a wide range of radiographic techniques and set of parameters from very low (1 mAs, 55 kV) to very high (140 mAs, 120 kV) exposures. Multiple x-ray units were used to ensure that the measured doses are independent of x-ray units and are dependent on the specified radiographic parameters. Measurements were performed at the standard medical radiographic imaging Source-to-Image-Distances (SID) of 100 cm and 180 cm. all the x-ray beams were collimated to produce a 20 cm × 20 cm field size.
We measured the radiation doses at different depths and estimated entrance surface doses during common radiological procedures. Measured doses fall exponentially with depths at all energies and exposures. A nonlinear relation is clearly evident between the dose and the x-ray beam energy. The measurements also show that the radiation dose is directly proportional to the exposure. Entrance Surface Doses (ESD) were also measured and found to be as low as 0.119 mGy±0.020 (0.092-0.141) for extremities to as high as 13.083 mGy±3.988(8.246-17.560) to the Spine and Abdomen. ESDs for the chest x-ray were measured to be 0.158 mGy±0.074(0.034-0.275).



National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 2006.

McCollough CH. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys 2008; 95: 508-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000326343.35884.03

Huda W, Sandison GA. The use of the effective dose equivalent, HE, as a risk parameter in computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 1236-1238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-59-708-1236

McCollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 2000; 27: 828-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598948

Nahum AE. Perturbation effects in dosimetry: part 1. Kilovoltage x-rays and electrons. Phys Med Biol 1996; 41: 1531-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/41/9/001

Ma CM, Nahum AE. Bragg–Gray theory and ion chamber dosimetry for photon beams. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36: 413-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/36/4/001

Ma CM, Coffey CW, DeWerd LA, Liu C, Nath R, Seltzer SM, Seuntjens JP. AAPM protocol for 40–300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Med Phys 2001; 28: 868-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1374247

Seuntjens J, Thierens H, Segaert O. A Response of coaxial Ge(Li) detectors to narrow beams of photons for stripping of x-ray bremsstrahlung spectra. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 1987; 258: 127-31.

Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfield K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, Smyth V, Vynckier S. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy, an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water Technical Report Series No 398 (Vienna: IAEA, 2000).

Klevenhagen SC, Aukett RJ, Harrison RM, Moretti C, Nahum AE, Rosser KE. The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL; 10–300 kV generating potential). Phys Med Biol 1996; 41: 2605-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/41/12/002

Grimbergen TWM, Aalbers AHL, Mijnheer BJ, Seuntjens J, Thierens H, Van Dam J, Wittkamper FW, Zoetelief J. Dosimetry for low and medium energy x-rays: a code of practice in radiotherapy and radiobiology Technical Report 10, 1997, Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry.

Akselrod MS, Btter-Jensen L, McKeever SWS. Optically stimulated luminescence and its use in medical dosimetry. Radiat Meas 2006; 41(Suppl. 1): S78-99.

Yukihara EG, McKeever SWS. Optically stimulated luminescence OSL dosimetry in medicine. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: R351-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/R01

Reft CS. The energy dependence and dose response of a commercial optically stimulated luminescent detector for kilovoltage photon, megavoltage photon and electron, proton and carbon beams. Med Phys 2009; 36: 1690-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3097283

Hill, et al. Ionization chamber dosimetry for kilovoltage x-ray beams “An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams. Med Phys 2009; 36: 3971-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3183820

Li XA, Ma CM, Salhani D. Measurement of percentage depth dose and lateral beam profile for kilovoltage x-ray therapy beams. Phys Med Biol 1997; 42: 2561-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/019

Ma CM, Li XA, Seuntjens JP. Study of dosimetry consistency for kilovoltage x-ray beams. Med Phys 1998; 25: 2376-2384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598448

British Journal of Radiology. Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol Suppl. 1996; 25.

Dietze G, Harrison JD, Menzel HG. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced: comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 521-3). Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 348-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/91937653

Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 639-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/25922439

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009; 301: 500-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.54

Ciraj O, Markovi? S, Košuti? D. Patient Dose From Conventional Diagnostic Radiology Procedures In Serbia And Montenegro. The Journal Of Preventive Medicine 2004; 12(3-4): 26-34.

Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG. Doses to patients from routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in England. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 749-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-59-704-749

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Source and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly. United Nations. New York 2000.

Padovani R, Contetnto G, Fabretto M. Patient doses and risks from diagnostic radiology in north-east Italy. Br J Radiol 1987; 60: 155-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-60-710-155

European Commission: European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images, EUR 16260 EN 1996.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Syed Mansoor Naqvi, Zaheer Uddin, Zafar Sajjad, Imran Ahmed Siddiqui , Amjad Hussan