Modeling For Valuing Knowledge as Perceived by Business Managers Using Statistical Tools


 Knowledge Management, Value of Knowledge, Knowledge Lifecycle, Knowledge Value Line, Knowledge Value Wheel, Knowledge Value Lifecycle.  

How to Cite

Muhammad Syed-ul Haque, Irfan Anjum Manarvi, Memoona R. Khan, Afaq Ahmed Siddiqui, & Shameel Ahmed Zubairi. (2016). Modeling For Valuing Knowledge as Perceived by Business Managers Using Statistical Tools. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 12, 398–405.


Knowledge is a valuable asset as it brings success and sustainability to the organizations. Till recently, the value of an organization is determined from its financial statements. These statements are historical in nature and contain the book value of physical assets, hence do not depict the true worth of an organization. The future revenue/profit from the organization depends upon its capability to make best use of its assets. This depends on the quality of knowledge an organization possess and its capability to use that knowledge asset. Therefore, knowledge is the most important asset in an organization. However there is no financial statement or business document that shows the volume and value of knowledge present in the organization. Hence, it is critical to determine the value of knowledge to ascertain true worth of an organization.
This research study attempts to present factors that influence the value of knowledge during its life cycle. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaire instrument was used to get subsequent data from 521 business managers working in various industries. The collected data was subjected to various statistical tools to evaluate the factors and their hypothesis. The twenty two factors identified initially were first analyzed for their verification and authenticity. Later each item was regrouped through the Rotated Component Matrix analysis – first order for meaningful set of factors. Based on the result of second order Rotated Component Matrix analysis, all the newly identified factors were finally grouped into two groups of factors that influences the value of knowledge. These groups were: ‘Efforts’ and ‘Business’. The integration of ‘Efforts’ and ‘Business’ factors forms the Knowledge Value Wheel (KVW) that helps in defining the “Knowledge Value Line” (KVL). The KVL depicts the value of knowledge at any given time. The KVL and KVW combines to form the “Knowledge Value Life Cycle” (KVLC).
The findings will help further research in the area of knowledge management. Managers would be able to differentiate most valuable and useful knowledge asset for effective management. Need for further R&D on critical knowledge can be identified. It would also be beneficial to the investors in determining the true worth of an organization in terms of its knowledge asset.


Varadarajan R, Yadav MS, Shankar V. First-Mover Advantage in an Internet-Enabled Market Environment: Conceptual Framework and Propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 2008; 36(3): 293-308.

Feher P. Combining Knowledge and Change Management at Consultancies. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 2004; 2(1): 19-32.

Blumentritt R, Johnston R. Towards A Strategy For Knowledge Management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 1999; 11(3): 287-300.

Benya H, Passiante G, Belbaly NA. Corporate Portal: A Tool for Knowledge Management Synchronization. International Journal of Information Management 2004; 24: 201-220.

Haque MS, Manarvi IA. Knowledge Value Life Cycle (KVLC): Determining Parameters of Valuing Knowledge. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management 2010; 10(1): 205-220.

Renner W. Human Values: A Lexical Perspective. Personality and Individual Differences 2003; 34(1): 127-141.

Holsapple CW, Singh M. The Knowledge Chain Model: Activities for Competitiveness. Expert Systems with Applications 2001; 20(1): 77-98.

Krogstie L, Sindre G, Jorgensen H. Process Models Representing Knowledge for Action: A Revised Quality Framework. European Journal of Information System 2006; 15: 91-102.

Birkinshaw J, Sheehan T. Managing the Knowledge Life Cycle. IEEE Engineering Management Review 2003; 31(3): 75-83.

Mesaric J. Knowledge Management – Necessity and Challenge in Small and Medium Enterprise. 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Iti 2004; Cavtat, Croatia, June 7-10.

Chen Y, James LM, Chang C. The Influence of Intellectual Capital on New Product Development Performance - The Manufacturing Companies Of Taiwan As An Example. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2006; 17(10): 1323-1339.

Woker T. Principles of Copyright in Intellectual Property Law: An Overview. Critical Arts 2006; 20(1): 35-46.

Malet L, Reynaud M, Llorca PM, Falissard B. Impact of Practitioner's Training in the Management of Alcohol Dependence: A Quasi-Experimental 18-Month Follow-Up Study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2006; 1(18).

Ye Y, Nakakoji K, Yamamoto Y. Reducing. The Cost Of Communication And Coordination In Distributed Software Development, In Bertrand Meyer & Mathai Joseph. (Ed.) Seafood, Lncs 4716. Springer 2007; 152-169.

Xu Y, Elgh F, Erkoyuncu JA, Bankole O, Goh Y, Cheung WM, Baguley P, Wang Q, Arundachawat P, Shehab E, Newnes L, Roy R. Cost Engineering For Manufacturing: Current And Future Research. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 2011.

Tang J, Le CD. Multidimensional Innovation and Productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2007; 16(7): 501-516.

Wizarat S, Hye Q. Financial Reforms And Industrial Sector Growth: Bound Testing Analysis For Pakistan. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 2010; 5(2): 75-81.

Shaheen A, Farooqi YA. Relationship Among Employee Motivation, Employee Commitment, Job Involvement, Employee Engagement: A Case Study Of University of Gujrat, Pakistan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering 2014; 5(9): 12-18.

Tien FF. To What Degree Does The Desire For Promotion Motivate Faculty To Perform Research? Testing the Expectancy Theory. Research in Higher Education 2000; 41(6): 723-752.

Guo C. Liu Y, Hou S, Wang W. Innovative Product Design Based On Customer Requirement Weight Calculation Model. International Journal of Automation and Computing 2010; 7(4): 578-583.

Lee J, Ali MA. Innovative Product Advanced Service Systems (I-Pass): Methodology, Tools, and Applications for Dominant Service Design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Muhammad Syed-ul Haque, Irfan Anjum Manarvi, Memoona R. Khan, Afaq Ahmed Siddiqui , Shameel Ahmed Zubairi