Effect of Temperature and Storage Time on DNA Quality and Quantity from Normal and Diseased Tissues


 DNA, degradation, concentration, purity, temperature, spectrophotometer.

How to Cite

Imran Tarique Samoo, Pershotam Khatri, Bachal Bhutto, Mansoor Tariq, Iqra Chandio, Munaza Soomro, Saqib Ali, & Sheeba Shams. (2017). Effect of Temperature and Storage Time on DNA Quality and Quantity from Normal and Diseased Tissues. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 13, 203–206. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2017.13.35


DNA extraction and purification is an initial step for authentic results in advance molecular biology, therefore DNA degradation is unavoidable. The aim of present study is to investigate the DNA quality and quantity in terms of shorter time preservation with normal and diseased tissue, therefore tissues of normal (n = 18) and diseased (n = 18) liver, lung and heart was collected from goat after slaughtered. For DNA extraction Gene JET Genomic DNA Purification Kit protocol was followed, then stored at -20 oC and -04 oC temperatures for 24hrs and 48hrs period of time. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were measured with Spectrophotometer and purity confirmed at an absorbance ratio of 260 or 280. It was observed that at a -20 oC temperature for 24hours the concentration of DNA yield was numerically higher than at -04 oC temperature for tissue stored at 48hrs, whereas absorbance was higher, however in normal tissues in contrast with diseased the concentration and absorbance of DNA was somehow same at -20 and -04 oC but different in storage time. On the basis of these findings, it was concluded that time elapsed between sampling with the storage condition and with normal or diseased samples for DNA extraction will largely depend on the experiment. If tissue preservative conditions and sampling are appropriate, storage time will not be a factor at least for short storage periods.



Thomas SM, Moreno RF, Tilzer LL. DNA extraction with organic solvents in gel barrier tubes. Nucleic Acid Res 1989; 17: 5411. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.13.5411

Schuurman T, de Boer R, Patty R, Kooistra-Smid M, van Zwet A. Comparative evaluation of in-house manual, and commercial semi-automated and automated DNA extraction platforms in the sample preparation of human stool specimens for a Salmonella enterica 5?-nuclease assay. J Microbiol Methods 2007; 71: 238-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.09.003

Webb V, Davies J. Antibiotic preparations contain DNA: a source of drug resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 2379-2384. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.37.11.2379

Kim SY, Byrn R, Groopman J, Baltimore D. Temporal aspects of DNA and RNA synthesis during human immunodeficiency virus infection: evidence for differential gene expression. J Virol 1989; 63: 3708-3713.

McOrist AL, Jackson M, Bird AR. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples. J Microbiol Methods 2002; 50: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00018-0

Tang JN, Zeng ZG, Wang HN. An effective method for extraction of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods. J Microbiol Methods 2008; 75: 432-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.07.014

Ariefd-johan MW, Savaiano DA, Nakatsu CH. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutr J 2010; 9: 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-23

Persson S, de Boer RF, Kooistra-Smid AM, Olsen KE. Five commercial DNA extraction systems tested and compared on a stool sample collection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 69: 240-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.023

Piper P. Extraction of yeast DNA. Methods Mol Biol 1996; 53: 103-107.

Michaud CL, Foran DR. Simplified field preservation of tissues for subsequent DNA analyses. J of Forens Sci 2012; 56: 846- 852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01771.x

Willliams S. Safe and legal shipment of tissue samples: does it affect DNA quality. Journal of Molluscan Studies 2007; 73: 416-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eym039

Omar WBW, Shafi MSB, Kasim Z. DNA Extraction from Different Preserved Tissue of Cassidula aurisfelis for PCR study. Nature and Science 2009; 7: 8-14.

Eschbach E. Ascertaining optimal protocols for DNA extraction of different qualities of pike (Esox lucius) tissue samples, a comparison of commonly used solid phase extraction methods. Environment Biotech 2012; 8: 7-14.

Moreano F, Busch U, Engel KH. Distortion of genetically modified organism quantification in processed foods: influence of particle size compositions and heat-induced DNA degradation. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53: 9971-9979. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051894f

Naiara R-E, Iñaki M, Paula Á, Unai C. Effect of fish sampling and tissue storage conditions in DNA quality: considerations for genomic studies. Revista de Investigación Marina 2013; 20(6): 78.

Peano C, Samson MC, Palmieri L, Gulli M, Marmiroli N. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the genomic DNA extracted from GMO and non GMO foodstuffs with four different extraction methods. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52: 6962-6968. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf040008i

Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 2001.

Nagy Z. A hands-on overview of tissue preservation methods for molecular genetic analyses. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 2010; 10: 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-010-0012-4

ISO 21571, Foodstuffs—Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products-Nucleic acid extraction 2005.

Dawson M, Raskoff K, Jacobs D. Field preservation of marine invertebrate tissue for DNA analyses. Molecul Marine Bio and Biotech 1998; 7: 145-152.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2017 Imran Tarique Samoo, Pershotam Khatri, Bachal Bhutto, Mansoor Tariq, Iqra Chandio, Munaza Soomro, Saqib Ali , Sheeba Shams