Two way Panel Causality Analysis for Degree of Trade Openness and Size of City


Trade Openness, Economic city size, Panel causality, Growth, Region.

How to Cite

Uzma Tabassum, & Shaista Alam. (2018). Two way Panel Causality Analysis for Degree of Trade Openness and Size of City. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 14, 32–44.


The relationship between trade openness and economic size of city has long been a subject of much interest in international literature of trade. Trade Openness might increases the economic size of city by increasing the significance of transportation modes which are mostly present in urban areas and raising the demand for marketing, financing and communication. In contrast some literature argue that protectionism generates large cities as firms cluster in an urban area to minimize its unit cost via sharing of intermediate goods, labour pool and knowledge spill-over. Thus, there exist an important causal connection between the economic size of the city and its contribution in international trade. This paper is designed to explore these causal connections using panel causality analysis. The panel consists of fourteen major cities of Pakistan and 14 years commence from 1999-00 till 2012-13. The result affirms a positive two-way causal relationship between a cities' economic size and its degree of trade openness.


Ades AF, Glaeser EL. Trade and circuses: Explaining urban giants. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995; 110(1): 195-227.

Ahmad J, Kwan ACC. Causality between Exports and Economic Growth Empirical evidence from Africa. Economics Letters 1991; 37(3): 243-248.

Alonso V. Spatial Distribution of Production and International Trade: A Note, Regional science and Urban economics 1999; 29: 371-380.

Awokuse TO. Causality between exports, imports, and economic growth: Evidence from transition economies, Economics Letters 2007; 94(3): 389-395.

Behrens K, Gaigne C, Ottaviano GIP, Thisse JF. Countries, Regions and Trade; on the welfare impacts of economic integration, European Economic Review 2007; 51(5): 1277-1301.

Bouoiyour J. Trade and GDP Growth in Morocco: Short-run or Long-run Causality, Brazilian Journal of Business and Economics 2003; 3(2): 14-21.

Brulhart M. The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey, Rev World Econ 2011; 147: 59-83.

Chang R, Kaltani L, Loayza N. Openness is Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarities, Journal of Development Economics 2009; 90: 33-49.

Chow P. Causality between exports growth and industrial development, Journal of Development Economics 1987; 26: 55-63.

Clemens MA, Williamson JG. A tariff-growth paradox? Protection’s impact the world around, NBER Working Paper Series No. 8549, 2001.

Dar A, Amirkhalkhali S. On the impact of trade openness on growth: Further evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics 2003; 35(16): 1761-1766.

Das KD. Trade Liberalization and Industrial Productivity: An Assessment of Developing Country Experiences, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Working 2002; Paper No. 77, 2002

Dickey D, Fuller W. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979; 74: 427-431.

Dollar D. Outward-oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1992; 40(3): 523-44.

Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 2012; 29(4): 1450-1460.

Edwards S. Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know?” Economic Journal 1998; 108: 383-398.

Gabaix X. Ioannides YM. The Evolution of City Size Distributions, working paper. Department of Economics Tufts University, 2003.

Granger CWJ. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica 1969; 37(30): 424-438.

Gries R. Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis". Centre of International Economics Working Paper Series, No. 2011-06, 2012.

Harrison A. Openness and Growth: a time series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 1996; 48: 419-447.

Henderson JV. The Sizes and Types of Cities. American Economic Review 1974; 64: 640-657.

Henderson JV. Systems of Cities in Closed and Open economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1982; 12(3): 325-350.

Hsiao MW. Tests of Causality and Exogeneity between Export Growth and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development 1987; 12: 143.159.

Hurlin C, Venet B. Granger Causality tests in Panel data models with fixed coefficient, Working Paper Eurisco University Paris IX Dauphine, 2001.

Idris J, Yusop Z, Habibullah M. Trade openness and economic growth: a causality test in panel perspective. International Journal of Business & Society 2016; 17(2): 281-290.

Islam MN. Export expansion and economic growth: testing for co-integration and causality. Applied Economics 1998; 30(3): 415-425.

Jung W, Marshall P. Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 1985; 18: 1-12.

Krueger A. The experiences and lessons of Asia's super exporters. In V. Corbo, A. Krueger, & F. Ossa (Eds.), Exports-Oriented Development Strategies: The Success of Five Newly Industrialising Countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985.

Krugman PR Urban Concentration: The Role of Increasing Returns and Transport Costs, Conference Paper. World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economic 1994.

Krugman PR. The self-organizing Economy. Oxford Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

Krugman PR, Elizondo RL. Trade Policy and Third World Metropolis. Journal of Development Economics 1996; 49: 137-150.

Lee JW. International trade, distortions, and long-run economic growth. IMF Staff Papers 1993; 40 (2): 299-328.

Liu X, Burridge P, Sinclair PJN. Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: Evidence from China". Applied Economics 2002; 34(11): 1433-1440.

Mill ES, Song BN. Urbanization and Urban Problem, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1979.

Moomaw RL, Shatter AM. Urbanization and economic development: A bias toward large cities. Journal of Urban Economics 1996; 40(1): 13-37.

Perera-Tallo F. Growth Due to Globalization". International Economic Review 2003; 44: 651-676.

Phillips PCB, Perron P. Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Regression, Biometrika 1988; 75: 335-346.

Pritchett L, Sethi G. Tariff rates, tariff revenue, and tariff reform: some new facts. The World Bank Economic Review 1994; 8 (1): 1-16.

Rauch JE. Reconciling the pattern of trade with the pattern of migration, American Economic Review 1991; 106: 775-796.

Ricardo D. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Batoche Books, Canada 1817.

Romer D. Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1993; 108(4): 870-903.

Rosen KT, Resnick M. The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law of primacy. Journal of Urban Economics, 1980; 8(2): 165-186.

Sachs JD, Warner AM. Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Center for International Development and Harvard Institute for International Development 1995.

Sachs JD, Warner AM. Fundamental sources of long-run growth. American Economic Review 1997; 87: 184-188.

Sala-i-Martin XX. I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review 1997; 87(2): 178– 183.

Vamvakidis W. How Robust is the Growth-openness connection? Historical Evidence" Journal of Economic Growth 2002; 7: 57-80.

Wacziarg R. Measuring the Dynamic Gains from Trade. World Bank Economic Review 2001; 15(3): 393-429.

Zhewei H, Can Z. The Impact of Trade Openness on Urbanization – a study of Eastern China" Bachelor Thesis in Economics 2009.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences