Production of Ethanol from Ripe Plantain Peel Hydrolysate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae


Plantain peel, pretreatment, fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ethanol.

How to Cite

Cyprian E. Oshoma, Ese Okojie, & Bunmi B. Omorotionmwan. (2019). Production of Ethanol from Ripe Plantain Peel Hydrolysate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 15, 48–55.


Aim: Nigeria is amongst the largest Musa paradisiaca (Plantain) producing countries and ripe plantain peels are discarded as waste thus polluting the environment. Utilization of this agricultural waste to useful products like ethanol will be a welcome development. The influence of pretreatment on plantain peels hydrolysate for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the effect of media supplementation were studied.
Methodology: The pretreatment methods used before carrying out fermentation of the hydrolysate were acid, steam and alkali. Parameters analyzed in all the hydrolysates and during fermentation were cell number, pH value, ethanol, glycerol concentration and inhibitory compounds using standard procedures.
Results: The results showed that acid pretreatment had the highest cell number, glycerol and ethanol concentrations of 27.30 ± 2.47 x 106 cells/mL, 4.43± 0.15 mg/mL and 12.31± 0.08 mg/mL respectively. Alkali pretreated plantain peel hydrolysate had the least values of 12.25 ± 1.77 x 106 cells/mL, 3.81 ± 0.10 mg/mL and 7.50 ± 0.21 mg/mL for cell number, glycerol and ethanol concentrations, respectively. There was a significant difference in ethanol production when comparing the acid pretreatment to the others (P < 0.05). The acid hydrolysate was optimized by supplementing the media and results showed that the cell number, glycerol and ethanol concentration slightly increased.
Conclusion: It was observed that acid hydrolysate of plantain peels can be utilized economically as a cheap substrate for bioethanol production and the yield can be enhanced through media supplementation.


Waghmare AG, Arya SS. Utilization of unripe banana peels waste as feedstock for ethanol production. Bioethanol 2016; 2(1): 146-156.

Patel H, Patel A, Surati T, Shah G. Potential use of banana peels for the production of fermented products. Int J Environ Sci Develop 2012; 9(1): 1-7.

Oshoma CE, Greetham D, Louis EJ, Smart KA, Phister TG, Powell C, Du C. Screening of Non-Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation. Plos One 2015; 10(8): 0135626.

Tesfaw A, Assefa F. Current Trends in Bioethanol Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Substrate, Inhibitor Reduction, Growth Variables, Coculture, and Immobilization. Int. Scholarly Research Not 2014; Article ID 532852, 11 pages.

Akinyemi SOS, Aiyelaagbe IOO, Akyeampong E. Plantain (Musa spp.) cultivation in Nigeria: a review of its production, marketing and research in the last two decades. Acta Horticulture 2010; 548: 211-219.

Ayanwale AB, Fatunbi AO, Ojo M. Innovation Opportunities in Plantain Production in Nigeria. Guide Book 1. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Accra Ghana 2016.

Suhas VB, Arun P, Naveen S, Ashok K. Production of Bioethanol from fruits rinds by Saccharification and fermentation. Int J Sci Res Eng Technol 2013; 2(6): 362-365.

Ojure MA, Quadri JA. Quality evaluation of noodles produced from unripe plantain flour using xanthan gum. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 2012; 13(3): 740-752.

Ignale S, Joshi SJ, Gupte A. Production of Bioethanol using agricultural waste: Banana pseudo stem. Brazil J Microbiol 2014; 45(3): 885-892.

Kreger van Rij, NJW. The Yeasts-A taxonomic study. Third revised and enlarged edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1984

Boekhout T, Kurtzman CP. Principles and methods used in yeast classification, and overview of currently accepted genera. In: Wolf K, editor. Non-conventional Yeasts in Biotechnology: A Handbook. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1996.

Nuwamanya E, Chiwona-Karltun L, Kawuki RS, Baguma Y. Bioethanol production from non-food parts of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) AMBIO 2012; 41: 262-270.

Vaitheki S, Deepa B. A Comparative Study on the Production of Bioethanol from Individual and Mixed Fruit Wastes. Imperial J Interdiscipl Res 2016; 2(5): 652-657.

Sami M, Ikeda M, Yabuuchi S. Evaulation of alkaline methylene blue staining method for yeast activity determination. J Ferment Bioeng 1994; 87: 212-216.

Wang M, Choong Y, Su N, Lee M. A Rapid Method for Determination of Ethanol in Alcoholic Beverages Using Capillary Gas Chromatography. J Food Drug Analy 2003; 11(2): 133-140.

Ogbeibu AE. Biostatistics: A Practical Approach to Research and Data Handling (2nd edition). Mindex Publishing Company, Edo, Nigeria 2015; p. 285.

Clarence SY, Sunny EI, Emmanuel IU. Temperature optimization for bioethanol production from corn cobs using mixed yeast strains. J Biol Sci 2010; 10: 103-108.

Benerji DSN, Anyanna C, Rajini K, Rao BS, Banerjee DRN. Studies on physico-chemical and nutritional parameters for the production of ethanol from Mahua Flower (Madhuaindica) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2090 through submerged fermentation. J Microb Biochem Technol 2010; 2(2): 46-50.

Scanes KT, Fang HY, Wang ZX, Chen DZ, Jin HR. Glycerol production by a novel osmotolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001; 55: 686-692.

Taherzadeh MJ, Adler L, Liden G. Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of glycerol-A review. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 2002; 3(1): 53-66.

Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R. Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2009; 2: 51-68.

Ask M, Maurizio B, Valeria M, Lisbeth O. The influence of HMF and Furfural on Redox-balance and Energy state of Xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013; 6: 1-13.

Almeida JRM, Modig T, Peterson A, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Increase tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2007: 82(4): 340-349.

Jonsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013; 6(16): 1-10.

Kefale A, Redi M, Asfau A. Potential of bioethanol production and optimization test from agricultural waste: The case of wet coffee processing waste (pulp). Int J Ren Energy Res 2012: 2(3); 446-450.

Akponah E, Akpomie OO. Optimization of bio-ethanol production from cassava effluent using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Afri J Biotechnol 2012; 11(32): 8110-8116.

Kapu NS, Piddocke M, Saddler JN. High gravity and high cell density mitigate some of the fermentation inhibitory effects of softwood hydrolysates. AMB Express 2013; 3: 15.

Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Steam pretreatment of acid-sprayed and acid soaked barley straw for production of ethanol. Appl Biochemist Biotechnol 2006; 129-132: 546-562.

Hamadi S, Muruke MH, Hosea KMM. Optimization of fermentation parameters for production of ethanol from Coffee Pulp Waste using Pichia anomala M4 Yeast isolated from Coffee environment in Tanzania. Int J Environ Sci 2014; 3 (4): 255-262.

Yue G, Yu J, Zhang X, Tan T. The influence of nitrogen sources on ethanol production by yeast from concentrated sweet sorghum juice. Biomass and Bioenerg 2012; 39: 48-52.

Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Oliva JM, Olsson L. Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 37: 1211-1220.

Boudjema K, Fazouane-Naimi F, Hellal A. Optimization of the bioethanol production on Sweet Cheese Whey by Saccharomyces cerevisiae DIV13-Z087C0VS using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Rom Biotechnol Let 2015: 20(5): 10814-10825.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Cyprian E. Oshoma, Ese Okojie , Bunmi B. Omorotionmwan