Earthquake recurrence is depicted on the basis of the time following subsequent seasons at the coastal regions of Pakistan. Recurrence time for intricate shock waves is simulated by using earth positions at equinoxes and perihelion-aphelion positions of the earth from the Sun. In connection to the spatial and temporal behavior of earth, the external geomagnetic variation is significant not only influenced by the distances between the Sun and earth and annual revolving period of earth around the Sun at heliocentric path but also affected by a lunar revolving period on an elliptical path around the earth. The Apparent path of the Sun during the year where earth is the center of the celestial sphere and relative to earth, the Sun appears on ecliptic sphere which intersects the celestial equator in two points known as the vernal equinox of 21st march and autumn equinox of 21st September. The perihelion position on earth is nearest to the Sun and aphelion is the furthest position of the earth from the Sun, these are empirically distributed on the basis of mutual interaction. The seasonal effects are recognized by the wavelet characterization on maximum amplitudes of shock waves with reference to vernal – autumn equinoxes of distributed perihelion-aphelion periods. The seasonal period of geomagnetic seismicity is a manifestation of the mean time between earthquakes within a specified region where many faults are activated. The cyclic nature of earthquakes and geomagnetic influences on seismic waves by stress-strain tectonic process and releasing energy for the relaxation mechanism are experienced in nature, therefore the issues relevant to their aphelion – perihelion periodicities, influential conditions of geomagnetic instability and their coupling for shock waves propagation are tackled by the wavelet applications.
Telesca L, Hattori K. Analysis of non-uniform scaling features in ultra low frequency geomagnetic signals and correlation with seismicity. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (ICSPC 2007), 2007: Nov 24-27; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 2007: p. 488-491. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPC.2007.4728362
Skordas ES, Sarlis NV. On the anomalous changes of seismicity and geomagnetic field prior to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake. J Asian Earth Sci 2014; 80: 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.008
Adushkin VV, Ryabova SA, Spivaka AA, Kharlamov VA. Response of the seismic background to geomagnetic variations. Doklady Earth Sci 2012; 444(1): 642-646. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X12050157
Currentia G, Negroa CD, Lapennab V, Telesca L. Scaling characteristics of local geomagnetic field and seismicity at Etna volcano and their dynamics in relation to the eruptive activity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005; 235: 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.043
Sanchez JPA, Alegria OC, Rodriguez MV, Abeyro JAC, Almaraz JRM, Gonzalez AD. Detection of ULF geomagnetic anomalies associated to seismic activity using EMD method and fractal dimension theory. IEEE Lat Am Transac Feb. 2017; 15(2): 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7854612
Mallat SG. A wavelet tour of signal processing. San Diego, USA: Academic Press; 1998.
Walter GG. Wavelets and other Orthogonal systems with applications. Florida, USA: CRC Press Inc.; 1992.
Wornell GW. Signal processing with Fractals: A wavelet based approach. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall; 1996.
Kumar P, Foufoula-Georgiou E. Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Rev Geophys 1997; 35(4): 385-412. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00427
Cambanis S, Masry E. Wavelet approximation of deterministic and random signals: convergence properties and rates. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1994; 40(4): 1013-1029. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.335971
Cambanis S, Houdre C. On the continuous wavelet transform of second-order random processes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1995; 41(3): 628-642. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.382010
Houdre C. Wavelets, probability and statistics: Some bridges. In J. J. Benedetto and M.W. Frazier, editors. Wavelets: Mathematics and Applications. Florida, USA: CRC Press In. 1993; p. 361-394.
Jaffard SL. Point wise smoothness, two microlocalization and wavelet coefficients. Publ. Mat. 1991; 35: 155-168. https://doi.org/10.5565/PUBLMAT_35191_06
Jaffard SL. Exposanys de Holder en des points donnes et coefficients d’ondellets. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. Mat., 308:79-81, 1989.
Holschneider M, Tchamitchian P. 1990 (Expose no. 8), Regularite locale de la function ‘non differentiable de Riemann. In P.G. Lemarie, editor, Les Ondelettes en 1989, volume 1438 of Lecture notes in Math. Springer Verlag, New York.
Pati YC, Rezaifar R, Krishnapardas PS. Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with application to wavelet decomposition. Proceedings of the 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers; 1993: 1-3 Nov; CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1993.342465
I. Daubechies, Time frequency localization operators: A geometric phase space approach. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1988; 34(4): 606-612. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.9761
Mallat SG, Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1993; 41(12): 3397-3415. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.258082
Chen SS, Donoho DL. Basis Pursuit. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Standford University, California, USA, 1994.
Chen SS, Donoho DL. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. Technical report 479, Department of Statistics, Standford University, California, USA, 1995.
Chen SS. Basis Pursuit. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Statistics, Standford University, California, USA, 1995.
Coifman RR, Wickerhauser MV. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1992; 38(2): 713-718. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.119732
Rogozhina EA, Sobisevicha AL, Toa S, Ziao L. Instrumental observations of geomagnetic disturbances prior to seismic events in several regions of China. Seismic Instrum 2017; 53(1): 28-45. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923917010091
Trifonova P, Zhelev Zh, Petrova T, Bojadgieva K. Curie point depths of Bulgarian territory inferred from geomagnetic observations and its correlation with regional thermal structure and seismicity, Tectonophysics 2009; 473(3-4): 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.014
Walden AT, Cristan AC. Matching pursuit by undecimated discrete wavelet transform for arbitrary-length time series. Technical Report TR -96-02, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Statistics Section, London, U.K., 1996.
Zhao L-F, Dong B-Z, Niu X, Zhang P-Q. Research on geomagnetic tectonic characteristics of the crust in Haicheng seismic area. ACTA Seismologica Sinica Nov 1993; 6(4): 949-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651830
Youd TL. Mapping of earthquake–induced liquefaction for seismic zonation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Stanford University; 1: 111-147, 1991.
Youd TL, Hoose SN. Liquefaction susceptibility and geologic setting. Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Dehli, 3: 2189-2194, 1977.
Moskovskaya LF. Directional and correlation analysis from the geomagnetic monitoring and seismic data on the Boso Peninsula in 2000. Izvestiya Phys Solid Earth 2012; 48(6): 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351312060043
Mizutani H, Ishido T. A new interpretation of magnetic field variation associated with the Matsushiro earthquakes. J Geomag Geoelectr. 1976; 28: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.28.179
Lukishov BG, Spivak AA, Ter-Semenov AA. Geomagnetic field variations in seismic waves traveling across a fault. Doklady Earth Sci 2012; 442(1): 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X12010163
Schekotov Y, Molchanov OA, Hayakawa M, Fedorov EN, Chebrov VN, Sinitsin VI, Gordeev EE, Belyaev GG, Yagova NV. ULF/ELF magnetic field variations from atmosphere induced by seismicity. Radio Sci Dec 2007; 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RS003441
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.