Performance of some Promising Genotypes of Soybean Under Different Planting Dates Using Biplots Analysis


Soybean genotypes, sowing dates, biplots analysis, seed yield and yield attributes.

How to Cite

A.A. Kandil, A.E. Sharief, A.R. Morsy, & A.I. Manar El-Sayed. (2012). Performance of some Promising Genotypes of Soybean Under Different Planting Dates Using Biplots Analysis. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 8(2), 379–385.


Soybean yield is affected by planting dates and there are significant efficiency losses when planting are done outward a relatively restricted period. Genotypes and environment are major contributing factor of plant phenotype. Economically important quantitative traits include agronomic characteristics. Four separate experiments are carried out in each season at the experimental farm of Sakha Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh during 2010 and 2011seasons. Seed yield of six soybeans cultivars i.e. Giza 21, Giza 22, Giza 111, H2L12, H30 and H32 examined at four different sowing dates i.e. 20th April, 5th May, of 20th May and 5th June of their effect on seed yield, and yield components. Highest number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, 100 seed weight (g), and seed yield. Soybean cultivars showed high difference in seed yield and its component, Giza 21 exhibited maximum number of pods/plant, 100 seed yield, and seed yield. H32 cultivar contributed highest number of branches/plant. Through genotypes and genotypes x environment biplots of regression model analysis results, the performance of a cultivar at different environments was compared, the performance of six cultivars at different environments (planting dates) were compared. The results indicated that sown on 5th May increased seed yield/ha by 19.7% compared with sown on 5th June and increased seed yield by 17.9% compared with sown on 20th April, and increased seed yield by 10.3% compared with sown on 20th May. It could be noticed that Giza 21 cultivar exceeded H32 line by 16.63%, H30 line by 14.6%, Giza 22 cultivar by 13.7%, H2L12 line by 6.5% and Giza 111 by 5.3% in seed yield/ha. Highest yielding cultivars at the different mega environments were identified, and ideal cultivars and test planting date was identified. It could be suggested that soybean genotypes of Giza 21 and Giza 111 are the most promising for planting date 5th May and recorded concentrated seed yield/ha.


Wilcox JR, Frankenberger EM. Indeterminate and determinate soybean responses to planting date. Agro. J. 1987; 79 (6): 1074-1078.

Conley SP, Santini JB. Crop management practices in Indiana soybean production systems. Online Crop Management 2007; doi:10.1094/CM-2007-0104-01-RS.

De Bruin JL, Pedersen P. Soybean seed yield response to planting date and seeding rate in the Upper Midwest. 2008; Agron. J. 100:696–703.

Grau CR, Oplinger ES, Adee EA, Hinkens EA, Martinka MJ. Planting date and row width effect on severity of brown stem rot and soybean productivity. J. Prod. Agric. 1994; 7: 347 – 351.

Arnold BH. Planting date, rate, and twin-row vs. single-row soybean. Mid-South Agronomy Journal 2011; 103 (5) 1313.

Hassan MZ, Al-Assily KhA, Mohamed MSA, Sharaf AE. Performance of some soybean cultivars under different sowing dates at newly reclaimed lands of East Owinat and Kharga. Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci. Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, 2002; 10(1): 173-179. search/search/;EG2003001757

Morsy AR. Evaluation of performance in top-cross of soybean yield through different planting dates. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor, 2010; 48 (2): 1- 21

Pedersen P, Lauer JG. Response of soybean yield components to management system and planting date. Agron. J. 2004; 96: 1372 – 1381.

Shafshak SE, Shams El-Din GM, Hassan MZ, Mohamed MSA. Evaluation of six soybean genotypes under different population densities and two sowing dates. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor, 1997; 35(1): 115-130.

Soliman MM, Rabie EM Ragheb SB. Response of soybean yield to late sowing date. Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci. Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, 2007; 15(1): 51-59.

Fehr WR, Caviness CE. Stages of soybean development. Iowa State Univ. Spec. 1977; Rpt. 80, Coop. Ext. Service, Iowa State University, Ames, lA

Kantolic AG, Slafer GA. Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in indeterminate soybean cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2001; 72: 109 – 118.

Bastidas AM, Setiyono TD, Dobermann A, Cassman KG, Elmore RW, Graef GL, Specht JE. Soybean sowing date: the vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts. Crop Sci. 2008; 48:727–740.

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. "Statistical Methods" 7th Ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press, 1980; Iowa, USA. ISBN -10:0813815606, Pages 507

Waller RA, Duncan DB (1969) A bayes for the symmetric multiple comparison problem. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 64 : 1484-1503.

Duncan DB. Multiple ranges and multiple F test. Biometrics, 1955; 11:1-42.

Gabriel KR. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 1971; 58 : 453 – 467.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 2000; 40: 597– 605.

Yan W, Cornelius PL, Crossa J, Hunt LA. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 2001; 41: 65 – 663.

El-Borai MA, Radi MM, Habeeb MB, Shalaby FH, El-Aidy NA. Effect of some water stress regimes and plant population on yield and seed quality of soybean. J. agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 1993; 18(8): 2198 – 2205.

Mohamed MSA. Implication of genotypes x planting date and row spacing interactions in soybean cultivar development. M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Egypt; 1988.