Impact of Production Practices on Organoleptic Intensity Scale of Different Rice Cultivars


 Organic farming, sensory evaluation, cooked rice, eating quality.

How to Cite

Amit Kesarwani, Madhu Sharma, Sachin Kumar Vaid, & Shih Shiung Chen. (2015). Impact of Production Practices on Organoleptic Intensity Scale of Different Rice Cultivars . Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences, 5(2), 114–120.


The purpose of this research was to relate mean organoleptic scores of organically and conventionally grown rice (n = 5) in japonica cultivars (Taikeng No. 16 and Kaohsiung No. 139). The 0-7 organoleptic scale is used in trials to measure the agronomic practices impact on sensory attributes of rice cultivars. However, the precise relationship between farming system and organoleptic analysis of rice remains independent variables. Judges (n = 10) used a common 0-7 scale to report the 6 sensory attributes viz. appearance, aroma, flavor, cohesion, hardness and overall acceptability while keeping cultivar Taikeng No. 9 as control. The scale ranges from – 3 to + 3 as very poor to excellent. The study demonstrates sensory attributes as inherited trait of rice; while no improvement found in cooking and eating quality under seasonal or agronomic variations. Interestingly, the aroma was reported as only better parameter when grown under organic farming compared to conventional farming (– 0.49 and – 0.62 over control, respectively). Also, the positive co-relationship exists between amylose content and organoleptic analysis while antagonistic link to crude protein content. The study cleared that management method, per se, did not influence any flavory attributes and detected no changes by the sensory panel. Further descriptive analysis needed with different conditions such as variety, degree of milling, growing location and moisture content which also played significant role in determining flavor and eating quality of rice cultivars.


Perez CM, Cagampang GB, Esmama BV, Monserrate RU, Juliano BO. Protein metabolism in leaves and developing grains of rices differing in grain protein content. Plant Phys 1973; 51: 537-42.

Shu YY. Effect of application of different types of organic composts on rice growth under laboratory conditions. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2005; 51: 443-9.

Saha S, Pandey AK, Gopinath KA, Bhattacharaya GR, Kundu S, Gupta HS. Nutritional quality of organic rice grown on organic composts. Agron Sustain Dev 2007; 27: 223-9.

Primo E, Casas A, Barber S, Barber CB. Factores decalidad del arroz. VI. Influencia de

Tamaki M, Ebata M, Tashiro T, Ishikawa M. Physicochemical studies on quality formation of rice kernel. II. Changes in quality of rice kernel during grain development. Jpn J Crop Sci 1989; 58: 659-63.

Prakash YS, Bhadoria PBS, Amitava R, Rakshit A. Relative efficacy of organic manure in improving milling and cooking quality of rice. Int Rice Res Notes 2002; 27: 43-4.

Juliano BO, Onate LU, del Mundo AM. Relation of starch composition, protein content, and gelatinization temperature to cooking and eating qualities of milled rice. Food Technol 1965; 19: 1006-11.

Perez CM, Juliano BO. Indicators of eating quality for non-waxy rices. Food Chem 1979; 4: 185-95.

Sowbhagya CM, Ramesh BS, Bhattacharya KR. The relationship between cooked rice texture and the physiochemical characteristics of rice. J Cereal Sci 1987; 5: 287-97.

del Mundo AM, Kosco DA, Juliano BO, Siscar JJH, Perez CM. Sensory and instrumental evaluation of texture of cooked and raw milled rices with similar starch properties. J Texture Stud 1989; 20: 97-110.

Ohtsubo K, Siscar JJH, Juliano BO, Iwasaki T, Yakoo M. Comparative study of texturometer and Instron texture measurements on cooked Japanese milled rices. Rep Nat Food Res Inst 1990; 54: 1-9.

Perez CM, Juliano BO, Boume MC, Anzaldua-Morales A. Hardness of cooked milled rice by instrumental and sensory methods. J Texture Stud 1993; 24: 81-94.

Kawamura S, Natsuga M, Itoh K. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for rice taste evaluation. Paper No. 96-3032. 1996; ASAF: St. Jospeh, Ml.

Lu X, Wu L, Pang L, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching cultivation under non-flooded condition on rice quality. J Sci Food Agric 2007; 87: 334-9.

Juliano BO, Perez CM, Barber S, et al. Instrumental cooperative comparison of instrument methods for cooked rice texture. J Texture Stud 1981; 12: 17-38.

Wangsomnuk, PP, Saenprom K, Poosittisak S, Pongdontri P, Srivvong P, Wangsomnuk P, Polthanee A, Kosittrakun M. 2009. Cultivar and farming practice affect yield and quality of thai rice. As J Food Ag-Ind 2009; (Sp.): S336-42.

Yamagata M, Ae N. Nitrogen uptake response of crops to organic nitrogen. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 1996; 42: 389-94.

Okamoto M, Okada K. Differential responses of growth and nitrogen uptake to organic nitrogen in four gramineous crops. J Exp Bot 2004; 55: 1577-85.

American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved methods of the AACC. 8th Ed. The Association: St. Paul, MN; 1983.

Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 3rd Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1999.

Tamaki M, Yoshimatsu K, Horino T. Relationships between the duration of organic farming culture and amylographic characteristics and mineral contents of rice. Jpn J Crop Sci 1995; 64: 677-81.

Champagne ET, Bett-Garber KL, Grimm CC, McClung AM. Effects of organic fertility management on physicochemical properties and sensory quality of diverse rice varieties. Cereal Chem 2007; 84: 320-7.

Tulyathan V, Leeharatanaluk B. Changes in quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. Khao Dawk MaLi 105 during storage. J Food Biochem 2007; 3: 415-25.

Tananuwong K, Malila Y. Changes in physicochemical properties of organic hulled riceduring storage under different conditions. Food Chem 2011; 125: 179-85.

Kesarwani A, Chen SS, Lee JF. Determination of physicochemical properties of rice under organic farming in Taiwan. Environ and Ecol 2014; 32(4A): 1445-9.

Na GS, Lee SK, Kim SY. Antioxidative effects and quality characteristics of the rice cultivated by organic farming and ordinary farming. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 2007; 50: 36-41.

Jin J, Xu DY, Cai YX, Hu SY, Ge M, Zhu QS. Effect of N-fertilizer on main quality characters of rice and RVA profile parameters. Acta Agron Sin 2004; 30: 154-8. (in Chinese with English abstract).

Juliano B, Perez CM. Major factors affecting cooked milled rice hard¬ness and cooking time. J Texture Stud 1983; 14: 235-43.

Saleh MI, Meullenet JF. The effect of moisture content at harvest and degree of milling (based on surface lipid content) on the texture properties of cooked long-grain rice. Cereal Chem 2007; 84: 119-24.

Al-Mana H, Mahmoud RM. Evaluation of imported rice in Saudi Arabia retail markets. Bull Fac Agric Univ Cairo 1991; 42: 1225-48.

Lee JF, Chen YW, Chen SS, Tsai YF. Effects of application amounts of various organic fertilizers on rice quality. TDAIS 2002; 74: 65-77.

Champagne ET, Bett KL, Vinyard BI, et al. 1999. Correlation between cooked rice texture and rapid visco analyser measurements. Cereal Chem 1999; 76: 764-71.

Suwanarit A, Kreetapirom S, Buranakarn S, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on grain qualities of Khaw Dauk Mali-105 aromatic rice. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 1996; 30: 458-74.

Srivastava PC, Singh US. Effect of graded levels of nitrogen and sulfur and their interaction on yields and quality of aromatic rice. J Plant Nutr 2007; 30: 811-28.

Champagne ET, Bett KL, Vinyard BT, et al. Effect of drying conditions, final moisture content and degree of milling on rice flavor. Cereal Chem 1997; 74: 566-70.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 Amit Kesarwani, Madhu Sharma, Sachin Kumar Vaid , Shih Shiung Chen