Vegetation Composition, Forage Biomass and Soil Seed Bank of a Continuously Grazed Rangeland Site in Tropical Sub-Humid Environment, Tanzania


vegetation cover
bush encroachment
communal grazing

How to Cite

Tito Eleutery Mdegela, Maleko, D. D., Msalya, G. M., & Mtengeti, E. J. (2022). Vegetation Composition, Forage Biomass and Soil Seed Bank of a Continuously Grazed Rangeland Site in Tropical Sub-Humid Environment, Tanzania. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 18, 58–64.


Most rangelands along the agro-pastoral villages of Tanzania are yearlong grazed and at various states of degradation. These rangelands contribute to over 60% of the meat and milk production in the country. An inventory was conducted to assess the status of grazing resources in a typical agro-pastoral village of Tanzania having communal rangelands. Systematic random sampling techniques were employed whereby line transects and quadrat frame were used following standard procedures to collect samples and undertake field measurements for both vegetation and soil parameters. The vegetation cover for desirable pasture species, undesirable pasture species and litter were 67.7%, 10.5% and 9.4%, respectively. The soil bare patches covered 12.3 % of the surveyed rangeland site. The most dominant grass species were Enteropogon macrostachyus, Bothriochloa insculpta and Heteropogon contortus. Forage dry matter (DM) yield was 806.8 kg DM/ha. Tree density was 1500 trees/ha and the total canopy cover was 63.49%. Combretum collinum was the most dominant tree species. Soil bulk density, pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were 1.4 g/cm3, 6.3%, 1.14%, 0.09%, 0.89 mg/kg and 0.33 g/kg, respectively. A total of 11 dicotyledonous species mainly forbs and 9 monocotyledonous species including two perennial grasses were revealed from the incubated soil samples. The findings of this study demonstrate that the communal grazing areas have low pasture productivity, poor soil seed-bank and high cover of woody plants mainly bushes. In order, to improve forage biomass at the study site and elsewhere with similar environments selective bush clearing and re-seeding should be considered.


Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta E, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, et al. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 2011; 66: 2-28

Sayre NF, McAllister RR, Bestelmeyer BT, Moritz M, Turner MD. Earth stewardship of rangelands: Coping with ecological, economic, and political marginality. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2013; 11(7): 348-354.

Godde C, Garnett T, Thornton P, Ash A, Herrero M. Grazing systems expansion and intensification: Drivers, dynamics, and trade-offs. Global Food Security 2018; 16: 93-105.

Selemani IS. Communal rangelands management and challenges underpinning pastoral mobility in Tanzania: a review. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2014; 26(5).

Sangeda AZ, Maleko, DD. Rangeland condition and livestock carrying capacity under the traditional rotational grazing system in northern Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2018; 30(5). lrrd30/5/sange30079.html

Musese LJ, Andrew SM, Shirima DD, Witt A, Kilewa R. Effects of the Abundance of Parthenium hysterophorus on the composition and diversity of other herbaceous plant species in Simanjiro Rangeland, Tanzania. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research 2020; 7(5): 11-20.

Kimaro EG, Mor SM, Toribio JAL. Climate change perception and impacts on cattle production in pastoral communities of northern Tanzania. Pastoralism 2018; 8(1): 1-16.

Magita SY, Sangeda AZ. Effects of climate stress to pastoral communities in Tanzania: A case of Mvomero District. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2017; 29(8)

Gintzburger G, Saïdi S. From inventory to monitoring in semi-arid and arid rangelands. Range and Animal Sciences and Resource Management 2010; 2: 237-273. Available from

Floyd DA, Anderson JE. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover. The Journal of Ecology 1987; 75(1): 221-228.

Mitchell K. Quantitative analysis by the point-centered quarter method. (Accessed February 18, 2022)

Mganga KZ, Musimba NKR, Nyariki DM, Nyangito MM, Mwang'ombe AW. The choice of grass species to combat desertification in semi‐arid Kenyan rangelands is greatly influenced by their forage value for livestock. Grass and Forage Science 2015; 70(1): 161-167.

Boonman G. East Africa’s grasses and fodders: Their ecology and husbandry. New York: Kluwer 1993.

Kapu NL. Assessment of rangeland condition and evaluation of the nutritional value of common grass and browse species at the Neudamm experimental farm, Namibia (Doctoral dissertation). (Accessed February 02, 2022)

Toledo M, Poorter L, Peña‐Claros M, Alarcón A, Balcázar J, Chuviña J et al. Patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of Bolivia. Biotropica 2011; 43: 405-413.

Aboling S, Sternberg M, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J. Effects of cattle grazing timing and intensity on soil seed banks and regeneration strategies in a Mediterranean grassland. Community Ecology 2008; (1): 97-106.

Van den Berg L, Kellner K. Restoring degraded patches in a semi-arid rangeland of South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 2005; 61(3): 497-511.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.